Princess 'caught frolicking naked'

LONDON, England -- Britain's Princess Eugenie has been reprimanded by her school after being caught frolicking naked on college grounds, it was reported Saturday.

Princess Eugenie is sixth in line to the British throne.

The 18-year-old daughter of Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and Sarah Ferguson, was apprehended for her involvement in end of term "high jinks" at the exclusive Marlborough College, west of London, the UK Press Associated said.

A royal source told the Press Association: "It was nothing more than high jinks at the end of term in May. A group of them were reprimanded and that's the end of the matter."

The tabloid Sun newspaper reported that a college staff member was woken by playful shrieks and found several young women dancing around without clothes.

It said there was no suggestion boys were present or that drugs were involved but claimed a pupil said the students had been drinking.

Princess Eugenie, the sixth in line to the British throne, is studying art, history of art and English at the $46,000-a-year college, PA said.

It said the princess was expected to be among guests celebrating the official birthday of Queen Elizabeth II on Saturday.

Comment

I would want to frolick with her…

— johnnyb · Jun 14, 03:34 AM · #

she is a cow. british girls are beat.

— drew · Jun 14, 05:14 AM · #

Hey Now! A naked Princess. I like the sounds of that!!

JT
http://www.Fireme.to/udi

— John thomas · Jun 14, 05:15 AM · #

frolicking naked in the school yard is one of the sanest activities a young person can engage in, a triumph of the the human spirit.

the hell with queen elizabeth ii, boy does she live a long time (it’s time for humanity to discard the useless and repressive kingship systems of the world).

— bert · Jun 14, 05:16 AM · #

What? No pictures?

— Diggitty · Jun 14, 05:37 AM · #

@bert

how can the monarchy be repressive if it has only symbolic power?

Also, the monarchy serves a very legitimate purpose, as a neutral, non-partisan head of state among other things.

— sdpope · Jun 14, 05:39 AM · #

@sdpope
Tradition out ways purpose to a large degree as far as monarchy goes these days. If they were to all die off tomorrow aside from a slight loss in tourism, Britain would continue as normal. If their estates were auctioned off with the proceeds going to charity then i for one would welcome the death of all monarchy, or at least their abolishion as ‘royals’

— brian · Jun 14, 06:37 AM · #

Naked pics or it didnt happen

— neednewbed.com · Jun 14, 06:43 AM · #

Tits of GTFO

— ummm · Jun 14, 06:55 AM · #

Pix, nao!

— Seafire · Jun 14, 06:56 AM · #

She is nothing special.

— Tim · Jun 14, 06:56 AM · #

“She is nothing special.” ??

She’s a princess, Tim.

— Meh · Jun 14, 07:54 AM · #

She (is a princess who) is nothing special.

— Tim · Jun 14, 08:44 AM · #

nice hat

— hattie · Jun 14, 08:47 AM · #

I’d hit it

— obama hussein · Jun 14, 09:43 AM · #

@brian

You forget that the Queen is the head of state of not only the U.K, but also Canada and Australia. Although her role is represented by the governor general, she still has one. IMO, a neutral head of state, one that doesn’t have to bother with partisan politics but doesn’t have any serious power is a good thing.

The monarchy is more good than bad.

— sdpope · Jun 14, 09:54 AM · #

Royal family members are also humans.
George – http://worldonblog.com/

— George · Jun 14, 10:54 AM · #

http://www.beyondthemargin.net/2008/06/life-as-slave.html

— GoBoilers · Jun 14, 12:32 PM · #

looks like monica lewinsky

— whuddafugger · Jun 16, 02:22 AM · #

PHOTOSHOPPED!!!!!!

— PSTUBBS · Jun 25, 01:58 AM · #